|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genpei Akasegawa (赤瀬川 原平 Akasegawa Genpei?) is a pseudonym of Japanese conceptual artist Katsuhiko Akasegawa (赤瀬川 克彦 Akasegawa Katsuhiko?) (born March 27, 1937 in Yokohama). He used another pen name Katsuhiko Otsuji (尾辻 克彦 Otsuji Katsuhiko?) for novels.
HistoryDuring the 1960s, Akasegawa became involved within the Neo-Dada movement. He formed the Hi-Red Center with Jiro Takamatsu and Natsuyuki Nakanishi during this time, which was a group of artists that presented their works as a collective in Japan; they performed happenings within the Hi-Red Center. Genpei was also associated with the avant-garde. In 1980s he came up with an idea of Hyper-Art (chōgeijutsu), an ordinary but useless street object that happened to look like a conceptual artwork. He called such things Tomasons, (named for Yomiuri Giants outfielder Gary Thomasson) and published photographs of them first within the magazine Shashin Jidai and later within books. As "Katsuhiko Otsuji," he received the Akutagawa Prize in 1981 for his short story, "Chichi ga kieta". "Thousand-Yen Bill Incident"In January 1963, Akasegawa sent out invitations to a solo exhibition at a gallery in Tokyo. The announcement was delivered to several close friends in a cash envelope that was mailed through the postal service.1 The announcement itself was a 1,000 yen note reproduced in monochromatic colors on the front, with relevant information regarding the exhibit on the back. He produced four more during the next year. In January 1964, his 1,000 yen note partial reproductions became noticed by the police and he was indicted for counterfeiting stemming from the 1894 Law Controlling the Imitation of Currency and Securities.2 The language of the law was quite vague, prohibiting any manufacture or sale of objects with an exterior front that may “be confused for currency or securities.” In August 1966, he went on trial for what was dubbed the "Thousand-Yen Bill Incident." In June 1967, he was found guilty, but appealed twice. The decision was upheld in 1970. References
Bibliography
External links
|
| All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |